Abstract
This interview centers on A Matter of Detail, a collaborative volume that brings anthropology and philosophy into conversation through a shared concern with the concept and practice of detailing. Structured in three movements, the discussion begins with broad, conceptual questions about the aims of the book, including its refusal of a teleological and Eurocentric history of “detail” and its proposal to approach detail not as a fixed object but as a dynamic mode of attention. The editors reflect on how detailing operates across disciplines, not as the accumulation of facts, but as a way of articulating what matters and to whom. The second part of the interview turns to more specific chapters, exploring themes such as repetition and magnification, the dialectic between part and whole, the relation between detail and complexity, and the epistemological stakes of attending to detail without presupposing stable social orders. Contributors also discuss detail in relation to memory, vulnerability, authoritarian politics, and ordinary language philosophy, drawing on figures such as Wittgenstein, Cavell, Austin, and Veena Das. The interview concludes by reflecting on the book’s dialogical structure, its decision to forgo a synthetic conclusion, and its commitment to leaving disciplinary “seams” visible—inviting further conversation rather than closure.
Author's Department/Program
Anthropology
Document Type
Interview Transcript
Publication Date
2-11-2026
Language
English (en)
DOI link
https://doi.org/10.7936/d7ap-n733
Author ORCID
Andrew Brandel, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6201-1635
Sandra Laugier, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9676-5854
Perig Pitrou, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-012X
Tomas de Oliveira, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8561-7354
Anna Wood, https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3230-1422
Recommended Citation
Brandel, Andrew; Laugier, Sandra; Pitrou, Perig; Fall, Gloria; de Oliveira, Tomas; Wood, Anna; and Canna, Maddalena, "A Matter of Detail: An interview with Andrew Brandel, Sandra Laugier, and Perig Pitrou" (2026). Transatlantic Forum. 2.
The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.7936/d7ap-n733