Scholarship@WashULaw
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2019
Publication Title
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Abstract
This article examines the debates over recent proposals for “mens rea reform.” The substantive criminal law has expanded dramatically, and legislators have criminalized a great deal of common conduct. Often, new criminal laws do not require that defendants know they are acting unlawfully. Mens rea reform proposals seek to address the problems of overcriminalization and unintentional offending by increasing the burden on prosecutors to prove a defendant’s culpable mental state. These proposals have been a staple of conservative-backed bills on criminal justice reform. Many on the left remain skeptical of mens rea reform and view it as a deregulatory vehicle purely designed to protect defendants accused of financial or environmental crimes. Rather than advocating for or against such proposals, this article argues that opposition to mens rea reform should trouble scholars and activists who are broadly committed to criminal justice reform. Specifically, I argue that the opposition demonstrates three particular pathologies of the U.S. criminal system and U.S. criminal justice reform: (1) an overreliance on criminal law as a vehicle for addressing social problems; (2) the instinct to equalize or level up—when faced with inequality, many commentators frequently argue that the privileged defendant should be treated as poorly as the disadvantaged defendant, rather than using the privileged defendant’s treatment as a model; and (3) the temptation for mass incarceration critics to make exceptions and support harsh treatment for particularly unsympathetic defendants. Ultimately, this article argues that achieving sweeping and transformative criminal justice reform will require overcoming the three pathologies.
Keywords
Criminal Law, Criminal Justice, Criminal Justice Reform, Mens Rea, Mens Rea Reform, Overcriminalization, Mass Incarceration, Statutory Interpretation, Strict Liability, Prosecutorial Discretion, Race, White Collar Crime, Corporate Crime, Theories of Punishment
Publication Citation
Benjamin Levin, Mens Rea Reform and its Discontents, 109 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 491 (2019)
Repository Citation
Levin, Benjamin, "Mens Rea Reform and iIs Discontents" (2019). Scholarship@WashULaw. 384.
https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_scholarship/384