Can Child Development Accounts Be Inclusive? Early Evidence From a Statewide Experiment
Publication Date
3-19-2015
Summary
A key objective of Child Development Accounts (CDAs) is to increase college completion rates among disadvantaged youth by helping families accumulate assets for college and by encouraging youth to see themselves as college bound. While the major asset-building programs in the United States almost exclusively benefit socioeconomically advantaged individuals, CDAs explicitly aim to facilitate account holding and asset accumulation by disadvantaged families. But can CDAs meet the goal of being inclusive? This research uses data from a large CDA experiment with probability sampling and random assignment to examine early savings outcomes. Findings indicate that CDAs improve outcomes for diverse demographic groups and sometimes have greater impacts on disadvantaged children than on advantaged children. Features like automatic account opening and automatic initial deposits, which are uncommon in other asset-building programs, extend the opportunities and benefits of asset accumulation to disadvantaged families.
Document Type
Article
Category
Financial Inclusion
Subarea
Asset Building
Original Citation
Beverly, S. G., Kim, Y., Sherraden, M., Nam, Y., & Clancy, M. (2015). Can Child Development Accounts be inclusive? Early evidence from a statewide experiment. Children and Youth Services Review, 53, 92–104. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.03.003
Project
SEED for Oklahoma Kids
Keywords
529, asset holding, asset ownership, assets, CDA, child development, child development account, child savings, children, experiment, household development, inclusive policy, institutional features, institutional support, institutional theory, intervention, matched saving, policy, policy design, post-secondary education, randomized controlled trial, research, saving, savings, SEED OK, social inclusion, social policy, state policy, United States, well-being
Recommended Citation
Beverly, S. G., Kim, Y., Sherraden, M., Nam, Y., & Clancy, M. (2015). Can Child Development Accounts be inclusive? Early evidence from a statewide experiment. Children and Youth Services Review, 53, 92–104. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.03.003