ORCID

Jeremy Bertomeu, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6746-5767

Language

English (en)

Publication Date

2015

Abstract

We develop a unified treatment of truthful disclosure (persuasion) games, providing a joint framework that nests, among other models, unraveling theory (Grossman 1981; Milgrom 1981), costly disclosure (Jovanovic 1982; Verrecchia 1983), uncertainty about information en- dowment (Dye 1985; Jung and Kwon 1988) and multi-dimensional disclosure (Shin 2003). We show the existence of (at most) a unique equilibrium that is reasonable given a commonly used signaling refinement, and provide a constructive proof of the equilibrium strategy and beliefs. We use the model to examine the following question: can the sender benefit from a regulation that commits to disclosing more precise information? We show that the sender is worse off if an unconditional reduction in discretion induces a more informative equilibrium. Conversely, mandating disclosure of unfavorable information may increase the sender’s ex ante payoff.

Document Type

Working Paper

Author's Department

Accounting

Author's School

Olin Business School

Included in

Business Commons

Share

COinS