Abstract

This dissertation compares flax cultivation and linen production in Anglo-America and Hessen-Kassel during the long eighteenth century to explain how polities embarked on political projects attempting to build and display coherence, capacity, capability, competence, and credibility, through ordinary work on land, labor, and exchange. Treating “flax-linen” as a single complex of production and meaning, it links field ecologies (such as rotations, manures, retting waters), labor regimes (such as household discipline, gendered time, guild rules, coercive exemptions), and quality/market infrastructures (such as inspection marks, warehouses, export corridors, Atlantic re-exports). This bundled political project was made persuasive by visible practices such as homespun mobilizations or stamped, graded cloth. Yet neither polity escaped entanglement: short-haul input circuits, shipping regimes, and Atlantic price systems repeatedly exposed the limits of mastery. By tracing off-ledger subsidies (such as women’s labor, commons, woodlands, non-human labor) and ecological burdens (such as polluted waters, polluted air, resource extraction), the dissertation shows that these political projects functioned as credibility machines that often displaced costs and accumulated hidden vulnerabilities even when they generated real coordination and output.

Committee Chair

Christine Johnson

Committee Members

Diana Montaño; Peter Kastor; Steve Hindle; Tanya Kevorkian

Degree

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Author's Department

History

Author's School

Graduate School of Arts and Sciences

Document Type

Dissertation

Date of Award

4-28-2026

Language

English (en)

Available for download on Thursday, April 27, 2028

Share

COinS