Abstract

This thesis examines how changes in the composition of classical music institutions’ funding bases in the 1980s and 1990s shaped their programming priorities and institutional behavior. Through two case studies—one focused on the Saint Louis Symphony Orchestra’s “In Unison” program and the other focused on Sybil Harrington’s philanthropic support of the Metropolitan Opera—it explores how individual and institutional funders used legal, financial, and symbolic mechanisms to exert influence over the music presented on symphonic and operatic stages. The first chapter argues that the Saint Louis Symphony’s community engagement efforts in the 1990s were shaped by the priorities of its public and private funders, particularly those promoting “neoliberal multiculturalism.” The second chapter examines Harrington’s use of restricted gifts, donor agreements, and social networking to promote traditional 18th- and 19th-century European repertoire. Together, these case studies highlight the extent to which classical music programming decisions are mediated by philanthropic agendas and show how scholars might study cultural patronage in recent decades, even in the absence of institutional transparency. Drawing from traditional archives, as well as court filings and press accounts, this thesis argues that understanding classical music institutions’ artistic output requires close attention to the funding structures that underwrite it.

Committee Chair

Alexander Stefaniak

Committee Members

Patrick Burke, Lauren Eldridge Stewart

Degree

Master of Arts (AM/MA)

Author's Department

Music

Author's School

Graduate School of Arts and Sciences

Document Type

Thesis

Date of Award

5-2025

Language

English (en)

Included in

Music Commons

Share

COinS