This item is under embargo and not available online per the author's request. For access information, please visit http://libanswers.wustl.edu/faq/5640.

Title

The Asymmetry Thesis: Pleasure and Pain's Radically Different Contributions To Well-Being

Date of Award

Winter 8-15-2012

Author's School

Graduate School of Arts and Sciences

Author's Department

Philosophy/Neuroscience, and Psychology

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Degree Type

Dissertation

Abstract

In the philosophical literature, it has often been assumed that pleasure and pain play a symmetrical role in human well-being. I examine recent empirical results and argue that most ways of thinking about symmetry between pleasure and pain in relation to well-being are implausible given what we know from science. I argue that accepting an asymmetrical account of pleasure and pain can help solve several vexing problems in philosophical theories of well-being and beneficence.

Language

English (en)

Chair and Committee

John Doris

Committee Members

Carl Craver, Julia Driver, Eric Brown, Simine Vazire, Dan Haybron

Comments

Permanent URL: https://doi.org/10.7936/K7NV9G6N

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS