The Asymmetry Thesis: Pleasure and Pain's Radically Different Contributions To Well-Being

Author

Adam Joseph Shriver, Washington University in St. LouisFollow

Abstract

In the philosophical literature, it has often been assumed that pleasure and pain play a symmetrical role in human well-being. I examine recent empirical results and argue that most ways of thinking about symmetry between pleasure and pain in relation to well-being are implausible given what we know from science. I argue that accepting an asymmetrical account of pleasure and pain can help solve several vexing problems in philosophical theories of well-being and beneficence.

Committee Chair

John Doris

Committee Members

Carl Craver, Julia Driver, Eric Brown, Simine Vazire, Dan Haybron

Comments

Permanent URL: https://doi.org/10.7936/K7NV9G6N

Degree

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Author's Department

Philosophy/Neuroscience, and Psychology

Author's School

Graduate School of Arts and Sciences

Document Type

Dissertation

Date of Award

Winter 8-15-2012

Language

English (en)

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7936/K7NV9G6N

Recommended Citation

Shriver, Adam Joseph, "The Asymmetry Thesis: Pleasure and Pain's Radically Different Contributions To Well-Being" (2012). Arts & Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 283.

The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.7936/K7NV9G6N