Abstract
This dissertation focuses on the impact of anglophilia on identity formation in the British empire. Since Britishness was an identity unavailable to non-white citizens of the empire, this attachment was necessarily unrequited. Analyzing works by Cornelia Sorabji, E.R. Braithwaite, V.S. Naipaul, and Tsitsi Dangarembga, I argue that the critical significance of anglophilia does not lie in the postcolonial subject’s success or failure in achieving a British-coded identity, but in the ways in which an affiliation to Britishness can be mobilized to accomplish a variety of personal, political, and social ends. I use a range of autobiographical literature—travel narratives, autobiographical novels, autoethnography—to contend that anglophilia is a significant, if overlooked, affective framework that structures late colonial and postcolonial subject formation. The blending of fact and fiction and the explicit authorial self-performance that autobiographical writing entails highlights one of the core components of my argument: postcolonial anglophilic self-formations exist in the tense space between the undeniable power of socially determined categories (“non-white,” “colonized,” “woman”) and the often-unexpected ways in which they are affectively felt and performed.
Committee Chair
J. Dillon Brown
Committee Members
Heather Berg
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Author's Department
English and American Literature
Document Type
Dissertation
Date of Award
Winter 12-15-2022
Language
English (en)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7936/rsp5-h672
Recommended Citation
Kundu, Anwesha, "Uneasy Attachments: Postcolonial Anglophilia and Identity Formation in Twentieth-Century Anglophone Autobiographies" (2022). Arts & Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 2776.
The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.7936/rsp5-h672