Abstract

Conflict-modulated cognitive control accounts posit that control processes adjust attention based on the probability of conflict associated with a given context (e.g., list of items, a particular item within a list, etc.). However, within these accounts, it is not yet fully understood how the control system learns about the probability of conflict. A specific question I address in the present research is how far back does the control system look to learn about the probability of conflict? In other words, what is the time scale of conflict learning for the control system? I use a statistical model recently developed by Aben et al. (2017) that captured the time scale of conflict learning for list-level control processes in a flanker task. The set of analyses I present shows that this model reliably captures the time scale of conflict learning for task-general, list-level control processes (Analysis 1 and Analysis 2). In addition, I also demonstrate that there are no differences in the time scale of conflict learning for differentially conflicting items within a list which are thought to engage item-level control (Analysis 3 and Analysis 4). I discuss potential reasons for the time scale patterns and the implications they may have for extant theories of cognitive control.

Committee Chair

Julie Bugg

Committee Members

Todd Braver David Balota

Comments

Permanent URL: https://doi.org/10.7936/r925-zg40

Degree

Master of Arts (AM/MA)

Author's Department

Psychology

Author's School

Graduate School of Arts and Sciences

Document Type

Thesis

Date of Award

Spring 5-2019

Language

English (en)

Download

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS