Waldlektüren. Zur Figuration und Funktionalisierung des Waldes bei Ludwig Tieck und Adalbert Stifter
Abstract
Following the impact of the so-called 'spatial turn', ‘space’ has become a central subject of investigation for literary and cultural studies. Recent theoretical research has expanded upon from, amongst others, Michel Foucault’s heterotopia, Michail Bachtin’s chronotope or Jurij Lotman’s concept of boundary. Using these narratological concepts, this thesis examines a very particular space, namely the forest and its figurations and its instrumentality in novels from the 19.th century. The literary worlds of Ludwig Tieck’s novella 'Waldeinsamkeit' and Adalbert Stifter’s novel 'Der Waldgänger' focuses, as the titles already suggest, on the idea of the forest and its relationship to the protagonists. Analyzing forest and space – the forest as space – enables a deeper insight into the protagonists’ behavior and the structure of the novels and thus provides new understandings of the texts. For an initial strategy, the thesis shall give an overview over various definitions of ‘space’, describing the current state of research and the media history of the German Forest. Following this, Tieck’s 'Waldeinsamkeit' will be interpreted with regards not only to the forest but also to factors such as ‘time’, ‘subject’ and ‘ambiguity’. Finally, Stifter’s novel will be analyzed under the aspects of ‘boundary’ and frontier resp. other spaces; with a specific focus on the relationship between ‘nature’ and ‘culture’.
Committee Chair
Paul Michael Lützeler
Committee Members
Lynne Tatlock, Gerhild Scholz Williams
Degree
Master of Arts (AM/MA)
Author's Department
Germanic Languages and Literatures
Document Type
Thesis
Date of Award
Summer 8-2014
Language
German (de)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7936/K73776PP
Recommended Citation
Stocker, Florian, "Waldlektüren. Zur Figuration und Funktionalisierung des Waldes bei Ludwig Tieck und Adalbert Stifter" (2014). Arts & Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 11.
The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.7936/K73776PP
Comments
Permanent URL: https://doi.org/10.7936/K73776PP