Scholarship@WashULaw

Gender, Race, and Interruptions at Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2025

Publication Title

American Political Science Review

Abstract

In this research letter, we examine whether gender and racial bias affect interruption rates at one of the most visible events in American politics: US Supreme Court confirmation hearings. Using original data from 1939 to 2022, we find that male and white participants are more likely to interrupt women and person of color speakers, respectively, relative to male and white speakers. This finding holds for both senators and nominees as interrupters. Our results provide evidence that biased interruptive behavior occurs in even the most public and salient of political settings and that it can be mitigated (or intensified) by shared (or opposite) partisanship among speaking pairs. We also find interruption inequalities are not isolated to women as the interrupted, revealing that people of color in political and legal settings are subject to heightened rates of interruptions as well.

Keywords

Supreme Court, Confirmation Hearings, Gender, Race, Interruption, Judicial Behavior, Political Communication

Publication Citation

Christina L. Boyd, Paul M. Collins Jr. & Lori A. Ringhand, Gender, Race, and Interruptions at Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings, 119 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 492 (2025)

Link

Share

COinS