
Scholarship@WashULaw
Document Type
Article
Language
English (en)
Publication Date
2012
Publication Title
Criminal Justice Magazine (ABA)
Abstract
A recent study found that poor criminal defendants in Philadelphia who were represented by court-appointed private lawyers were more often found guilty and sentenced to more time in prison than similarly situated defendants represented by public defenders. In this column, we review the details of the study, its findings, and its ethical and constitutional implications.
Keywords
Sixth Amendment, Public Defenders, Constitutional Rights of the Accused, Ethical Obligations of Defense Counsel
Publication Citation
Peter A. Joy & Kevin C. McMunigal, Does the Lawyer Make a Difference? Public Defender v. Appointed Counsel, 27 Crim. Just. 46 (2012)
Repository Citation
Joy, Peter A. and McMunigal, Kevin C., "Does the Lawyer Make a Difference? Public Defender v. Appointed Counsel" (2012). Scholarship@WashULaw. 815.
https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_scholarship/815
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Legal Studies Commons