Why a Narrowly Defined Legal Scholarship Blog Is Not What I Want: An Argument in Pseudo-Blog Form
Publication Title
Washington University Law Review
Abstract
Written in the form of a blog, this paper highlights the creative and communicative benefits of blogging, in particular legal blogging. This comment argues that aside from being intrinsically rewarding, blogging offers a concise scholarly model addressing a wider-ranger of topics. In this way, the paper claims that blogging has the potential for self-discovery and innovation in a way that legal scholarship might not.
Recommended Citation
Ann Althouse,
Why a Narrowly Defined Legal Scholarship Blog Is Not What I Want: An Argument in Pseudo-Blog Form,
84 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1221
(2006).
Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol84/iss5/19