Coase’s Paradox and the Inefficiency of Permanent Strike Replacements
Washington University Law Quarterly
The affinity between the Coase Theorem and the NLRA appears obvious. Both the theorem and the Act acknowledge bargaining as a potentially efficient problem-solving strategy. Both the theorem and the Act set efficiency as a goal. This Article examines this apparent affinity and challenges the idea that the Coase Theorem and the NLRA are compatible.
Seth D. Harris,
Coase’s Paradox and the Inefficiency of Permanent Strike Replacements,
80 Wash. U. L. Q. 1185
Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol80/iss4/3