Deficient Treatment of Deficiency Claims: Gilmore Would Have Repented
Publication Title
Washington University Law Quarterly
Abstract
Part I of this Article examines the fair value rule in the context of Gilmore's perception of the commercial reasonableness concept. Part II discusses the reaction to, and progress of, the fair value proposal in the Article 9 Drafing Committee.
Recommended Citation
Donald J. Rapson,
Deficient Treatment of Deficiency Claims: Gilmore Would Have Repented,
75 Wash. U. L. Q. 491
(1997).
Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol75/iss1/13