The Limited Relevance of Plain Meaning
Publication Title
Washington University Law Quarterly
Abstract
In this Article, I want to take the heretical position that linguists' principal expertise-ascertaining how language is used by ordinary speakers of English-is often of little value in interpreting controversial non-criminal federal statutes.
Recommended Citation
Stephen F. Ross,
The Limited Relevance of Plain Meaning,
73 Wash. U. L. Q. 1057
(1995).
Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol73/iss3/14