Rehabilitation, Redistribution or Dissipation: The Evidence for Choosing Among Bankruptcy Hypotheses
Washington University Law Quarterly
This Article addresses that new redistributive view of bankruptcy in its two most typical versions-which I denominate the "Rehabilitative" and "Pure Redistribution" hypotheses, respectively-and argues that neither is consistent with the existing empirical data concerning corporate reorganizations. It then proposes a new thesis about bankruptcy which is inspired not only by the existing data, but also by new theoretical insights: that measures which avoid some kinds of market failures, such as externalities, entail their own kinds of costs, e.g., by fostering holdout behavior. The new thesis-that bankruptcy law tends to waste resources- I denominate the "Dissipative" thesis.
James W. Bowers,
Rehabilitation, Redistribution or Dissipation: The Evidence for Choosing Among Bankruptcy Hypotheses,
72 Wash. U. L. Q. 955
Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol72/iss3/14