Washington University Law Quarterly
This Article has two aims: first, to show that there is indeed little to guide courts in interpreting section 514(a), and second, to show that despite this lack of guidance, courts can still apply the provision rationally.
ERISA and the Language of Preemption,
72 Wash. U. L. Q. 619
Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol72/iss2/4