A “Standing” Amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Authors

Daniel O. Bernstine, University of Wisconsin Law School

Publication Title

Washington University Law Quarterly

Abstract

This Article examines the constitutional and prudential policies underlying the standing requirement, and concludes that a federal court may render a valid judgment when the defendant fails to raise the standing issue prior to judgment.

Recommended Citation

Daniel O. Bernstine, A “Standing” Amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 1979 Wash. U. L. Q. 501 (1979).
Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol1979/iss2/8