Washington University Journal of Law & Policy
This article, by Professor William D. Warren of UCLA School of Law, analyzes Kokesh v. SEC where the Supreme Court held that disgorgement – a tool used by the SEC to recover ill-gotten gains through the courts – was a penalty rather than a remedy for the purposes of determining the appropriate statute of limitations. Warren contends that Kokesh raises questions about the validity of disgorgement as a sanction, especially considering issues of SEC authority, judicial power, and interstitial lawmaking.
Stephen M. Bainbridge,
Kokesh Footnote Three Notwithstanding: The Future of the Disgorgement Penalty in SEC Cases,
Wash. U. J. L. & Pol’y