Informed Consent as Compelled Professional Speech: Fictions, Facts, and Open Questions
Publication Title
Washington University Journal of Law & Policy
Abstract
This article explores the relationship between a physician’s First Amendment right to free speech and state informed consent mandates. Sawicki details the convoluted jurisprudence surrounding consent mandates, focusing on one-sided and controversial subject matter that many states require physicians to disclose. Sawicki then offers a legal framework for how a physician-challenged consent mandate may pass through the court system based on existing Supreme Court jurisprudence.
Recommended Citation
Nadia N. Sawicki,
Informed Consent as Compelled Professional Speech: Fictions, Facts, and Open Questions,
50
Wash. U. J. L. & Pol’y
011
(2016),
https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol50/iss1/2