Resale Price Maintenance After Leegin: Why Treating Vertical Price-Fixing As “Inherently Suspect" Is the Only Viable Alternative to the Traditional Rule of Reason
Publication Title
Washington University Journal of Law & Policy
Abstract
The Article focuses on resale price maintenance (RPM) and price fixing in the U.S. Information is provided on the U.S. Supreme Court case Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. PSKS Inc. which made vertical RPM legal under U.S. commerce law. Topics include the Court's interpretation of the U.S. Sherman Act and the validity of the rule of reason standard regarding price maintenance.
Recommended Citation
John Austin Moore,
Resale Price Maintenance After Leegin: Why Treating Vertical Price-Fixing As “Inherently Suspect" Is the Only Viable Alternative to the Traditional Rule of Reason,
36
Wash. U. J. L. & Pol’y
289
(2011),
https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol36/iss1/12