Volume 29 (2009) Empirical Research on Decision-Making in the Federal Courts
A New Look at Judicial Impact: Attorneys' Fees in Securities Class Actions After Goldberger v. Integrated Resources, Inc.
Theodore Eisenberg, Geoffrey P. Miller, and Michael A. Perino
An Examination of Strategic Anticipation of Appellate Court Preferences by Federal District Court Judges
Christina L. Boyd and James F. Spriggs II
How Should We Study District Judge Decision-Making?
Pauline T. Kim, Margo Schlanger, Christina L. Boyd, and Andrew D. Martin
What Is Judicial Ideology, and How Should We Measure It?
Joshua B. Fischman and David S. Law
Judicial Agenda Setting Through Signaling and Strategic Litigant Responses
Vanessa Baird and Tonja Jacobi
Inquiring Minds Want to Know: Do Justices Tip Their Hands with Questions at Oral Argument in the U.S. Supreme Court?
Timothy R. Johnson, Ryan C. Black, Jerry Goldman, and Sarah A. Treul
The Intersection of Judicial Attitudes and Litigant Selection Theories: Explaining U.S. Supreme Court Decision-Making
Jeff Yates and Elizabeth Coggins