The Liability of Ordinary Soldiers for Crimes of Aggression
Publication Title
Washington University Global Studies Law Review
Abstract
This “liability gap”-the fact that sovereigns and statesmen, but not subordinate officers and soldiers, are liable for jus ad bellum offences-is one of the great puzzles of international law and ethics. In this essay I examine the philosophical foundation of combatants’ war rights and the basis for liability for ad bellum offences. I conclude that there is at least a theoretical basis for extending liability for the crime of aggression to ordinary soldiers and lower ranking officers.
Recommended Citation
David Rodin,
The Liability of Ordinary Soldiers for Crimes of Aggression,
6
Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev.
591
(2007),
https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol6/iss3/11