Antitrust Treatment of Cartels: A Comparative Survey of Competition Law Exemptions in the United States, the European Union, Australia and Japan
Publication Title
Washington University Global Studies Law Review
Abstract
This Article compares four jurisdictional approaches to anticompetitive behavior: (1) the U.S. “rule of reason” approach, (2) the multifaceted flexible approach under the Treaty Establishing the European Community, (3) the relatively strict Australian per se illegality approach, and (4) the less-developed antimonopoly regime in Japan.
Recommended Citation
Jacqueline Bos,
Antitrust Treatment of Cartels: A Comparative Survey of Competition Law Exemptions in the United States, the European Union, Australia and Japan,
1
Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev.
415
(2002),
https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol1/iss1/16
COinS