This item is accessible only to the Washington University community.
Off-Campus WUSTL Users: Click the “Off-Campus Download” button below. You will be prompted to log in using your WUSTL Key.
Date of Award
Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD)
In the last quarter of the twentieth century Spain, South Korea, and Colombia were immersed under specific circumstances of institutional crisis. At these three countries, society and leaders combined undertook the task to solve said crisis. Part of the foreseen solution involved, in general, the adoption of a new constitution or at least the amendment of the existing one. In a more particular way, at these countries the establishment of a constitutional court represented the future validity of the constitutional consensus. Therefore, the 1978 Spanish Constitution, the 1987 South Korean Constitution, and the 1991 Colombian Constitution, reflect those compacts required for surpassing the previous crises. Constitutional Courts then, emerged as the guardians of the constitutional compacts, and of the consensus they symbolized toward the future.
Chair and Committee
John Owen Haley, Supervising Professor; Stanley L. Paulson, Examining Professor; David S. Law, Examining Professor.
Gonzalez, Rodrigo, "Constitutional Compacts and Judicial Review in Spain, South Korea and Colombia: a Comparative Approach" (2010). School of Law Dissertations. 35.