Searchable Title

Pilot Test of the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) to Increase Government Actions for Creating Healthy Food Environments. Copyright: Creative Common License.

Reference Type

Journal Article

Authors, Section

Vandevijvere, S.; Swinburn, B.; International Network for Food and Obesity/Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) Research Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS)

Title, Section

Pilot Test of the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) to Increase Government Actions for Creating Healthy Food Environments. Copyright: Creative Common License.

Publication Year

2015

Journal Title

BMJ Open

Volume

5

Issue

1

Pages

e006194

Availability

online

PMID

PMID: 25575874

DOI

10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006194

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Effective government policies are essential to increase the healthiness of food environments. The International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable diseases (NCDs) Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) has developed a monitoring tool (the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI)) and process to rate government policies to create healthy food environments against international best practice. The aims of this study were to pilot test the Food-EPI, and revise the tool and process for international implementation. SETTING: New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine informed, independent public health experts and non-governmental organisation (NGO) representatives. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Evidence on the extent of government implementation of different policies on food environments and infrastructure support was collected in New Zealand and validated with government officials. Two whole-day workshops were convened of public health experts and NGO representatives who rated performance of their government for seven policy and seven infrastructure support domains against international best practice. In addition, the raters evaluated the level of difficulty of rating, and appropriateness and completeness of the evidence presented for each indicator. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was 0.85 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.88; Gwet's AC2) using quadratic weights, and increased to 0.89 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.92) after deletion of the problematic indicators. Based on raters' assessments and comments, major changes to the Food-EPI tool include strengthening the leadership domain, removing the workforce development domain, a stronger focus on equity, and adding community-based programmes and government funding for research on obesity and diet-related NCD prevention, as good practice indicators. CONCLUSIONS: The resulting tool and process will be promoted and offered to countries of varying size and income globally. International benchmarking of the extent of government policy implementation on food environments has the potential to catalyse greater government action to reduce obesity and NCDs, and increase civil society's capacity to advocate for healthy food environments.

Share

COinS