Searchable Title

Caregiver Burden Questionnaire for Heart Failure (CBQ-HF): Face and Content Validity. (also known as: Caregiver Burden Questionnaire - Heart Failure Version 3.0 (CBQ-HF)). Copyright: Creative Commons License.

Reference Type

Journal Article

Authors, Section

Humphrey, L.; Kulich, K.; Deschaseaux, C.; Blackburn, S.; Maguire, L.; Stromberg, A.

Title, Section

Caregiver Burden Questionnaire for Heart Failure (CBQ-HF): Face and Content Validity. (also known as: Caregiver Burden Questionnaire - Heart Failure Version 3.0 (CBQ-HF)). Copyright: Creative Commons License.

Publication Year

2013

Journal Title

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Volume

11

Issue

May 25

Pages

84

Availability

online

PMID

PMID: 23706131

DOI

10.1186/1477-7525-11-84

Abstract

Full text of the Test is in the Additional Files link. BACKGROUND: A new caregiver burden questionnaire for heart failure (CBQ-HF v1.0) was developed based on previously conducted qualitative interviews with HF caregivers and with input from HF clinical experts. Version 1.0 of the CBQ-HF included 41 items measuring the burden associated with caregiving in the following domains: physical, emotional/psychological, social, and impact on caregiver's life. Following initial development, the next stage was to evaluate caregivers' understanding of the questionnaire items and their conceptual relevance. METHODS: To evaluate the face and content validity of the new questionnaire, cognitive interviews were conducted with caregivers of heart failure patients. The cognitive interviews included a "think aloud" exercise as the patient completed the CBQ-HF, followed by more specific probing questions to better understand caregivers' understanding, interpretation and the relevance of the instructions, items, response scales and recall period. RESULTS: Eighteen caregivers of heart failure patients were recruited. The mean age of the caregivers was 50 years (SD = 10.2). Eighty-three percent of caregivers were female and most commonly the patient was either a spouse (44%) or a parent (28%). Among the patients 55% were NYHA Class 2 and 45% were NYHA Class 3 or 4. The caregiver cognitive interviews demonstrated that the CBQ-HF was well understood, relevant and consistently interpreted. From the initial 41 item questionnaire, fifteen items were deleted due to conceptual overlap and/or item redundancy. The final 26-item CBQ-HF (v3.0) uses a 5-point Likert severity scale, assessing 4 domains of physical, emotional/psychological, social and lifestyle burdens using a 4-week recall period. CONCLUSIONS: The CBQ-HF (v3.0) is a comprehensive and relevant measure of subjective caregiver burden with strong content validity. This study has established that the CBQ-HF (v3.0) has strong face and content validity and should be valuable as an outcomes measure to help understand and monitor the relationship between patient heart failure severity and caregiver burden. A Translatability AssessmentSM of the measure has since been performed confirming the cultural appropriateness of the measure and psychometric validation is planned for the future to further explore the reliability, and validity of the new questionnaire in a larger caregiver sample.

Share

COinS