Searchable Title

Goal Evaluation Tool for Diabetes (GET-D): A Rubric for Evaluating the Quality of Participant Goal Setting (appears in: Measuring the Quality of Patients' Goals and Action Plans: Development and Validation of a Novel Tool). Copyright: Creative Commons License.

Reference Type

Journal Article

Authors, Section

Teal, Cayla R.; Haidet, Paul; Balasubramanyam, Ajay S.; Rodriguez, Elisa; Naik, Aanand D.

Title, Section

Goal Evaluation Tool for Diabetes (GET-D): A Rubric for Evaluating the Quality of Participant Goal Setting (appears in: Measuring the Quality of Patients' Goals and Action Plans: Development and Validation of a Novel Tool). Copyright: Creative Commons License.

Publication Year

2012

Journal Title

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volume

12

Issue

Dec. 27

Pages

152

Availability

online

PMID

PMID: 23270422

DOI

10.1186/1472-6947-12-152

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to develop and test reliability, validity, and utility of the Goal-Setting Evaluation Tool for Diabetes (GET-D). The effectiveness of diabetes self-management is predicated on goal-setting and action planning strategies. Evaluation of self-management interventions is hampered by the absence of tools to assess quality of goals and action plans. To address this gap, we developed the GET-D, a criteria-based, observer rating scale that measures the quality of patients' diabetes goals and action plans. METHODS: We conducted 3-stage development of GET-D, including identification of criteria for observer ratings of goals and action plans, rater training and pilot testing; and then performed psychometric testing of the GET-D. RESULTS: Trained raters could effectively rate the quality of patient-generated goals and action plans using the GET-D. Ratings performed by trained evaluators demonstrated good raw agreement (94.4%) and inter-rater reliability (Kappa = 0.66). Scores on the GET-D correlated well with measures theoretically associated with goal-setting, including patient activation (r=.252, P<.05), diabetes specific self-efficacy (r=.376, P<.001) and inverse relationship with depression (r= -.376, P<.01). Significant between group differences (P<.01) in GET-D scores between goal-setting intervention (mean = 7.33, standard deviation = 4.4) and education groups (mean = 4.93, standard deviation = 3.9) confirmed construct validity of the GET-D. CONCLUSIONS: The GET-D can reliably and validly rate the quality of goals and action plans. It holds promise as a measure of intervention fidelity for clinical interventions that promote diabetes self-management behaviors to improve clinical outcomes.

Share

COinS