Searchable Title

Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale: Adolescent Version (SAPAS-AV) (appears in: Screening for Personality Disorder in Incarcerated Adolescent Boys: Preliminary Validation of an Adolescent Version of the Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS-AV)). Copyright: Creative Commons License.

Reference Type

Journal Article

Authors, Section

Kongerslev, Mickey; Moran, Paul; Bo, Sune; Simonsen, Erik

Title, Section

Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale: Adolescent Version (SAPAS-AV) (appears in: Screening for Personality Disorder in Incarcerated Adolescent Boys: Preliminary Validation of an Adolescent Version of the Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS-AV)). Copyright: Creative Commons License.

Publication Year

2012

Journal Title

BMC Psychiatry

Volume

12

Issue

July 30

Pages

94

Availability

online

PMID

PMID: 22846474

DOI

10.1186/1471-244X-12-94

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Personality disorder (PD) is associated with significant functional impairment and an elevated risk of violent and suicidal behaviour. The prevalence of PD in populations of young offenders is likely to be high. However, because the assessment of PD is time-consuming, it is not routinely assessed in this population. A brief screen for the identification of young people who might warrant further detailed assessment of PD could be particularly valuable for clinicians and researchers working in juvenile justice settings. METHOD: We adapted a rapid screen for the identification of PD in adults (Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale; SAPAS) for use with adolescents and then carried out a study of the reliability and validity of the adapted instrument in a sample of 80 adolescent boys in secure institutions. Participants were administered the screen and shortly after an established diagnostic interview for DSM-IV PDs. Nine days later the screen was readministered. RESULTS: A score of 3 or more on the screening interview correctly identified the presence of DSM-IV PD in 86% of participants, yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 and 0.86 respectively. Internal consistency was modest but comparable to the original instrument. 9-days test-retest reliability for the total score was excellent. Convergent validity correlations with the total number of PD criteria were large. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence of the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the screen in secure institutions for adolescent male offenders. It can be used in juvenile offender institutions with limited resources, as a brief, acceptable, staff-administered routine screen to identify individuals in need of further assessment of PD or by researchers conducting epidemiological surveys.

Share

COinS