Searchable Title

Multidimensional Structure of the Groningen Frailty Indicator in Community-Dwelling Older People. Copyright: Creative Commons License.

Reference Type

Journal Article

Authors, Section

Bielderman, A.; van der Schans, C. P.; van Lieshout, M. R.; de Greef, M. H.; Boersma, F.; Krijnen, W. P.; Steverink, N.

Title, Section

Multidimensional Structure of the Groningen Frailty Indicator in Community-Dwelling Older People. Copyright: Creative Commons License.

Publication Year

2013

Journal Title

BMC Geriatrics

Volume

13

Issue

Aug. 22

Pages

86

Availability

online

PMID

PMID: 23968433

DOI

10.1186/1471-2318-13-86

Abstract

Full text of indicator is in Additional Files. ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Due to the rapidly increasing number of older people worldwide, the prevalence of frailty among older adults is expected to escalate in coming decades. It is crucial to recognize early onset symptoms to initiate specific preventive care. Therefore, early detection of frailty with appropriate screening instruments is needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the underlying dimensionality of the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), a widely used self-report screening instrument for identifying frail older adults. In addition, criterion validity of GFI subscales was examined and composition of GFI scores was evaluated. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used to evaluate the structural validity, internal consistency and criterion validity of the GFI questionnaire in older adults aged 65 years and older. All subjects completed the GFI questionnaire (n = 1508). To assess criterion validity, a smaller sample of 119 older adults completed additional questionnaires: De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, RAND-36 physical functioning, and perceived general health item of the EuroQol-5D. Exploratory factor analysis and Mokken scale analysis were used to evaluate the structural validity of the GFI. A Venn diagram was constructed to show the composition of GFI subscale scores for frail subjects. RESULTS: The factor structure of the GFI supported a three-dimensional structure of the scale. The subscales Daily Activities and Psychosocial Functioning showed good internal consistency, scalability, and criterion validity (Daily Activities: Cronbach's α = 0.81, H(s) = .84, r = -.62; Psychosocial Functioning: Cronbach's α = 0.80, H(s) = .35, r = -.48). The subscale Health Problems showed less strong internal consistency but acceptable scalability and criterion validity (Cronbach's α = .57, H(s) = .35, r = -.48). The present data suggest that 90% of the frail older adults experience problems in the Psychosocial Functioning domain. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings support a three-dimensional factor structure of the GFI, suggesting that a multidimensional assessment of frailty with the GFI is possible. These GFI subscale scores produce a richer assessment of frailty than with a single overall sum GFI score, and likely their use will contribute to more directed and customized care for older adults.

Share

COinS