This item is under embargo and not available online per the author's request. For access information, please visit http://libanswers.wustl.edu/faq/5640.
Date of Award
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Many contributors to the literature on democratic theory argue that deliberative democratic procedures yield outcomes that are of a better quality than those produced by other decision-making processes. My work builds on these arguments, but it is distinctive in that focuses on what I identify as a set of deliberative habits, capacities, and dispositions—including reflectiveness, the ability and willingness to exercise imagination, and epistemic humility—which shape the ways that citizens talk to each other, and even more importantly, the ways they listen. Its central claim is that there are epistemic benefits to deliberating, but that in order for those benefits to be realized, citizens must be equipped with these capacities and dispositions. Tuning in and Tuning Out contributes to the literature on deliberative democracy in two main ways. First, it advances a normative argument for attention to, not only democratic institutions, but also civic skills and habits. Rather than ask, “How should a deliberative democratic system be structured?” it asks, “How should citizens interact in a deliberative democracy?” Second, it focuses on, not just talking, but also listening, arguing that the skills and the dispositions required to listen in appropriate ways are crucial to tapping deliberation’s epistemic potential.
Chair and Committee
Ian MacMullen, Frank Lovett, Randall Calvert, Kit Wellmon,
Chick, Matthew Bryan, "Tuning in and Tuning Out: Deliberative Citizenship and Democracy’s Epistemic Potential" (2018). Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1725.
Available for download on Thursday, December 15, 2118