Washington University Law Review

Article Title

Why a Narrowly Defined Legal Scholarship Blog Is Not What I Want: An Argument in Pseudo-Blog Form

Authors

Ann Althouse, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Publication Title

Washington University Law Review

Abstract

Written in the form of a blog, this paper highlights the creative and communicative benefits of blogging, in particular legal blogging. This comment argues that aside from being intrinsically rewarding, blogging offers a concise scholarly model addressing a wider-ranger of topics. In this way, the paper claims that blogging has the potential for self-discovery and innovation in a way that legal scholarship might not.

Recommended Citation

Ann Althouse, Why a Narrowly Defined Legal Scholarship Blog Is Not What I Want: An Argument in Pseudo-Blog Form, 84 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1221 (2006).
Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol84/iss5/19