Washington University Law Review

Article Title

Coase’s Paradox and the Inefficiency of Permanent Strike Replacements

Authors

Seth D. Harris, New York Law School

Publication Title

Washington University Law Quarterly

Abstract

The affinity between the Coase Theorem and the NLRA appears obvious. Both the theorem and the Act acknowledge bargaining as a potentially efficient problem-solving strategy. Both the theorem and the Act set efficiency as a goal. This Article examines this apparent affinity and challenges the idea that the Coase Theorem and the NLRA are compatible.

Recommended Citation

Seth D. Harris, Coase’s Paradox and the Inefficiency of Permanent Strike Replacements, 80 Wash. U. L. Q. 1185 (2002).
Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol80/iss4/3