Washington University Law Quarterly
Part I of this Article examines the fair value rule in the context of Gilmore's perception of the commercial reasonableness concept. Part II discusses the reaction to, and progress of, the fair value proposal in the Article 9 Drafing Committee.
Donald J. Rapson,
Deficient Treatment of Deficiency Claims: Gilmore Would Have Repented,
75 Wash. U. L. Q. 491
Available at: http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol75/iss1/13