Washington University Jurisprudence Review
Criminal background checks in the hiring process make it more difficult for former offenders to obtain employment at their market skill level. As a result, many former offenders end up underemployed or unemployed altogether. This obstacle to finding gainful employment is a harm, and this harm directly follows from a former offender’s criminal conviction. The harm can therefore be thought of as part of the punishment imposed on criminal offenders. However, unlike the formal punishment that a criminal offender receives through his sentence, the harm that follows the offender as he seeks employment after he has completed his formal sentence has no basis in punishment theory.1 Criminal background checks in hiring is a policy that aims at furthering employer interests, not punishing criminal offenders. For this reason, the punitive effect of criminal background checks often goes overlooked even though there are simple, straightforward ways to reform the process without abridging the purpose of protecting employers.
Michael A. C. Lee,
Do Criminal Background Checks in Hiring Punish?,
9 Wash. U. Jur. Rev. 327
Available at: http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_jurisprudence/vol9/iss2/9
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Legal History Commons, Legal Theory Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Rule of Law Commons