Author's School

Arts & Sciences

Author's Department

Biology

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-1-2017

Originally Published In

Am Nat. 2017 Apr;189(4):345-353. doi: 10.1086/690937.

Abstract

Evolutionary biology is undergirded by an extensive and impressive set of mathematical models. Yet only one result, Fisher’s theorem about selection and fitness, is generally accorded the status of a fundamental theorem. I argue that although its fundamental status is justified by its simplicity and scope, there are additional results that seem similarly fundamental. I suggest that the most fundamental theorem of evolution is the Price equation, both because of its simplicity and broad scope and because it can be used to derive four other familiar results that are similarly fundamental: Fisher’s average-excess equation, Robertson’s secondary theorem of natural selection, the breeder’s equation, and Fisher’s fundamental theorem. These derivations clarify both the relationships behind these results and their assumptions. Slightly less fundamental results include those for multivariate evolution and social selection. A key feature of fundamental theorems is that they have great simplicity and scope, which are often achieved by sacrificing perfect accuracy. Quantitative genetics has been more productive of fundamental theorems than population genetics, probably because its empirical focus on unknown genotypes freed it from the tyranny of detail and allowed it to focus on general issues.

Comments

© 2017 by The University of Chicago. David C. Queller, "Fundamental Theorems of Evolution," The American Naturalist 189, no. 4 (April 2017): 345-353.

DOI: 10.1086/690937

DOI

10.1086/690937

Embargo Period

2-28-2018

Available for download on Wednesday, February 28, 2018

Share

COinS